Live pitch deck extension · 12-skill evaluation map

MZN mapped across the 12 skills of a one-person unicorn.

This page consolidates the evaluator-facing files built around Linas Beliūnas’s 12-skill one-person unicorn framework, plus two additional diligence documents that explain how the case should be compressed, reviewed, and connected to evidence.

Position: this is a provisional self-assessment and review map. It shows that MZN has been mapped across all 12 skills, with phase boundaries, guardrails, evidence-readiness logic, and diligence questions prepared for independent review.

Important boundary: this page does not claim that every asset is complete, legally finalized, or independently certified. It shows how the case has been organized for serious review: 12 skills, evidence-chain Q&A, proof prioritization, and phase-based diligence.

What this page is

A single landing page for the 12-skill evaluation package.

This page is designed for the live pitch deck. It lets a reviewer open the full set of 12 skill files, then continue into the two newer pages that answer the evidence-chain and proof-priority questions.

Layer 1

12-skill framework mapping

MZN has been mapped skill by skill: idea validation, business model, resources, GTM, product, sales, marketing, analytics, operations, team, deals, and legal/governance.

Layer 2

Evidence-chain architecture

The diligence Q&A explains how claims should connect to raw artifacts, verification methods, disclosure levels, and independent reviewer roles.

Layer 3

Compression and proof priority

The compression map explains what to read first, which five artifacts matter most, and how reviewers should enter a large asset portfolio.

Review principle: do not start by trying to read every asset. Start with the proof that determines whether everything else deserves review.
Diligence documents

The two files that make the package reviewable.

These files sit after the 12 skills and answer the practical evaluator question: how should this large case be audited?

13 · Diligence architecture

Independent Diligence Q&A

Converts the 12-skill package from argument map into evidence-chain logic. It covers claim types, artifact categories, verification methods, reviewer roles, disclosure levels, NDA boundaries, and 90-minute review material.

  • Claim → Evidence → Raw artifact → Verification → Reviewer
  • Phase 1, Phase 2, product, IP, buyer, valuation, legal Q&A
  • 90-minute review pack
14 · Compression and proof priority

Compression & Proof Priority Map

Solves the “too large to evaluate” problem by creating a 30-second to full-diligence review ladder, top five perception-changing artifacts, current readiness status, and reviewer-specific routing.

  • 30-second, 3-minute, 10-minute, 90-minute, full-diligence paths
  • Top 5 proof artifacts
  • Linked source-page review path
Phase boundary

The 12 skills are interpreted by phase.

The most important guardrail is not to mix Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 claims.

Phase 1

Mazzaneh MVP / Iran

Original MVP and company operation in Iran, personally funded, involving a 27-person execution team, product modules, users, businesses, transactions, analytics, and market testing.

  • Execution and market proof.
  • Not the solo Phase 2 claim.
  • Not the Phase 2 valuation base.
Phase 2

One-person AI-native asset formation

Deliberate solo formation of a broad product/IP portfolio through frontier AI chat subscriptions and basic tools.

  • One-person formation claim.
  • Productizable IP and architecture stack.
  • Not a claim that every product is complete.
Phase 3

International professionalization

Future execution phase: legal/IP/compliance review, technical validation, product rebuilds, pilots, partnerships, team formation, and commercialization.

  • Where final diligence belongs.
  • Where experts and partners enter.
  • Where legal and commercial structure is completed.
12-skill files

Open each skill file directly.

These links use the exact filenames from the uploaded final pack. Each file is a provisional assessment against one skill, not a final external certification.

#FileWhat it reviewsStatusOpen
00Master MapOverall phase logic, source hierarchy, maturity map, and evaluation question.Core mapOpen
01Idea ValidationProblem-to-architecture engine and validation logic.ProvisionalOpen
02Business ModelValue-conversion stack and monetization paths.ProvisionalOpen
03Resource AcquisitionPersonal capital, solo compression, and selective alignment.ProvisionalOpen
04Go-To-MarketRecognition → diligence → entry strategy.ProvisionalOpen
05ProductMaturity-layered productizable asset stack.ProvisionalOpen
06SalesStrategic buyer map and NDA funnel.ProvisionalOpen
07Marketing & BrandCategory formation and evidence-first brand stack.ProvisionalOpen
08Growth & AnalyticsPhase-specific signals and validation metrics.ProvisionalOpen
09OperationsConstraint operations and documentation-first execution.ProvisionalOpen
10Hiring & Team BuildingTeam proof, deliberate solo formation, and selective talent alignment.ProvisionalOpen
11Fundraising / Deal ArchitectureAsset-specific deals, aligned capital, and diligence before terms.ProvisionalOpen
12Legal / Governance / RiskLegal and governance readiness, not completion.ProvisionalOpen
13Independent Diligence Q&AEvidence-chain architecture and 90-minute review logic.NewOpen
14Compression & Proof Priority MapCompression ladder, top five proof artifacts, and reviewer routing.NewOpen
Recommended review path

Start with the summary path, then go deeper.

Fast review

10-minute entry

Formal diligence

Evidence-first path

  • Top 5 proof artifacts
  • Asset maturity matrix
  • Patent-grade claim table
  • Phase 2 provenance package
  • NDA evidence room

Public pages are orientation, not full proof.

The strongest raw artifacts — financial records, provenance records, IP materials, security-sensitive details, and some technical evidence — belong in restricted or NDA layers.

Closing posture

The purpose of this page is to make the 12-skill evaluation package easy to enter from the live pitch deck.

It does not ask the reader to accept the entire case from public pages. It shows what has been mapped, what has been prepared, and what must be independently reviewed.

The correct next step is not belief. It is structured review.