HUAI · Provisional LLM Capability Map

A serious LLM company
requires many capabilities.
HUAI maps 16 of them.

HUAI is a public, provisional capability map across 16 capability areas and 5 categories. It shows where MZN/HUAI has public, restricted, or reserved evidence for review. It is not a final technical validation report, not a valuation page, and not the full asset inventory.

Phase boundary: some signals in this page come from Phase 1 Mazzaneh product/platform evidence, including users, modules, and behavioral/product data. Phase 2 is the bounded solo AI-native formation layer. Phase 3 is where legal, privacy, technical, benchmark, and commercial validation must happen.
16
Capability Areas
168K
Phase 1 Users
22
Phase 1 Modules
Phase 3
Validation Needed
LLM Framework Strategic Asset Preview Evaluation Q&A
Standard LLM Structure

Major capability areas
for serious LLM review.

Category 1 — Model Structure

Architecture understanding, tokenizer, training recipe, data curation pipeline, alignment & safety recipe. The foundation: know what you are building, how to encode information, how to train, what data to use, how to make it safe.

Category 2 — Security & Control

Intent detection & safety, GPU monitoring, secure model storage, compliance logging. The defense: protect the model, the infrastructure, the users, and prove compliance.

Category 3 — Evaluation & Optimization

Structured evaluation framework, inference optimization. The discipline: know if your model is good, make it efficient.

Category 4 — Proprietary Data

User knowledge, taste understanding, verified engagement data. A potential moat: consent-first product and behavioral signals that should be reviewed for legal, privacy, and technical readiness. This category is not commonly visible in public LLM-provider products.

Phase 1 data boundary: Mazzaneh user/module metrics are Phase 1 product evidence. They are not proof of frontier LLM training readiness without Phase 3 consent, privacy, governance, and technical review.

Category 5 — Foundational Theory & Inventions

Novel theoretical frameworks for AGI safety. Novel compression or communication protocols. The edge: intellectual property that opens new categories.

HUAI + MZN Capability Map

16 areas mapped. Evidence varies by maturity.

1

Model Structure

1
Architecture Understanding (L0–L8)
51+ deep-dives. 9 diagnostic layers. 92 tests. Training objective to release gates. Every framework solves a problem this map identified.
Comparable work, if present, appears mostly internal to major labs
9/10
2
Tokenizer Architecture
12+ nodes. BPE, Unigram, WordPiece, multi-modal. Shared/bridged token spaces. Hierarchical semantic anchors. Arabic efficiency advantages. 6+ patent-grade candidate areas pending review.
Comparable work, if present, appears mostly internal to major labs
8.5/10
3
Training Recipe
8 sections: Model Selection, Fine-Tuning, Optimizer, LR Schedule, Batch Strategy, Stability, Parallelism, Checkpoint. Integrated with HUAI comparison lab.
Few pre-market companies have this structured
7/10
4
Data Curation Pipeline
7 sections: source families, tiering, filtering, contamination control, domain mixing. Section 2 leverages MZN proprietary data from Pulino, Board, and Taste — a Phase 1-rooted data layer requiring Phase 3 legal/privacy/technical review.
Architecture combined with unique data advantage
7/10
5
Alignment & Safety Recipe
534-line reviewer-grade. 9 sections: behavior shaping, SFT, preference alignment, safety, refusal, repair. Cultural Alignment Module for Arabic/Islamic calibration.
Cultural Alignment is differentiated
9/10
2

Security & Control

6
Security & Intent Detection (ISBP + ZOE)
4-stage ISBP. ZOE 20+ layers, 380+ components. Architectural intent detection at the model boundary. Multi-protocol design.
Comparable work, if present, appears mostly internal to major labs
9/10
7
GPU Security Monitoring
GPU Sentinel: 120+ metrics, 18 categories, 4 algorithms. Benchmarked against major GPU classes. Sub-20-second cryptojacking detection. ~implementation/pilot validation pending.
Independent category — no comparable commercial product
9/10
8
AI Secure Vault
10 modules: Weights, LoRA, Cleaning, Keys, Batches, Signatures, Audit, Embeddings, Synthetic Data, Kill Switches. AES-256-GCM + Merkle. Executable Python.
New category
9.8/10
9
Hidden Logging & Shadow Compliance
Contextual fingerprint. Integrity and compliance logs. Cognitive feedback. Model decay monitor. AI black-box flight recorder.
No directly licensable equivalent
9.6/10
3

Evaluation & Optimization

10
Evaluation Framework
92 tests. Comparison lab with baseline freeze. 48 worked cases. 12 hostile reviews. 12 failure injections. Adjudication. Release gates.
Few structured public alternatives
9/10
11
Optimization Frameworks
5 design frameworks: DCA (selective activation), UIOP (7-phase pipeline), Multi-Brain, Suprompt (intent-first), OFRP (cache-first). Substantial efficiency potential at scale.
Similar approaches are held internal at major labs
8/10
4

Proprietary Data — The Moat

12
Consent-First Personal Attribute Data (Pulino)
Occupation, income range, vehicle, housing, interests — consent-based and incentive-aligned. Each user attribute is explicit and validated. 168K users. Connected to businesses via Follow and Board.
Not present in any major LLM data layer
10/10
13
Taste Intelligence Engine
Progressive profiles from behavior, explicit preference selection, and Board response patterns. Taste ≠ interest. Cross-context. No repetitive questions.
No comparable consent-based equivalent
10/10
14
Verified Attention Data (Board)
Comprehension validated, not just exposure. 4 questions, 20 seconds. Cognitive speed and accuracy per category. CPQA replaces CPM as the unit metric.
No major ad system validates comprehension at this depth
9.5/10
5

Foundational Theory & Inventions

15
BioCode — Foundational AGI Framework
A theoretical framework treating biological systems as executable code. 4 layers. 5 disciplines. 10 patent-grade candidate areas. Applications across AI efficiency (brain 20W vs datacenter 100MW), medicine, and AGI alignment. Core undisclosed.
No comparable framework
Differentiated
16
HDTP — Beyond-Shannon Compression Protocol
Structural reduction via DNA-chain topology. Bit-perfect reconstruction. Channel-agnostic. 12 patent-grade candidate areas. Significant portion classified. Defense, crisis communication, IoT.
No comparable protocol
Differentiated

Result: 16 of 16

Every capability a complete LLM company needs — designed and owned by MZN.

Core Architecture

The diagnostic backbone.

HUAI Baseline Map (L0–L8): map first, solve second.

9/10

Architecture

L0–L8. 51+ deep-dives. 92 tests.

8.5/10

Tokenizer

12+ nodes. 6+ patent-grade candidate areas pending review. Arabic efficiency.

9/10

Security

ISBP + ZOE. Multi-layer protocols.

9/10

GPU Sentinel

120+ metrics. ~90% ready. New category.

8/10

Optimization

DCA, UIOP, Multi-Brain, Suprompt, OFRP.

9.8/10

Secure Vault

10 modules. AES-256-GCM. Kill switches.

9.6/10

Hidden Logging

Shadow Compliance. AI flight recorder.

9/10

Evaluation

92 tests. 48 cases. 12 hostile. 12 failure.

Next: Innovation & Differentiation →

Review Routing

Use HUAI as a map,
not a final certificate.

HUAI should route technical reviewers toward the LLM Framework, asset preview, IP baseline, evaluation protocol, and Phase 3 diligence path.

LLM FrameworkStrategic Asset PreviewIP BaselineEvaluateQ&APhase 3